Facebook’s bias shows – again.
The tech giant’s employees have consistently pushed to suppress or de-platform right-wing businesses like Breitbart, despite objections from leaders trying to avoid political setbacks, a violent report from the Wall Street Journal revealed.
The internal debates — captured in bulletin board conversations reviewed by the publication — give rise to new concerns that the platform treats news broadcasts differently based on political slant.
Of particular focus in the report was Breitbart, which employees have aimed to remove from the News tab, especially amid protests following George Floyd’s death by Minneapolis police last year.
After an employee asked about Breitbart’s removal, a senior researcher replied, “I can also tell you that we saw confidence in CNN 2 years ago: would we take the same approach for them, too?” he wrote.
By 2020, Facebook had begun keeping track of “strikes” for content considered fake by third-party fact checkers. Repeated offenders may be suspended from posting. Escalations came more often against conservative businesses, according to the report.
The report is the latest in a series of bombings by whistleblowers about the social media colossus ‘urge to profit over users’ needs.
In recent days, employees have been told to prepare for more information.
Nick Clegg, vice president of global affairs for Facebook, told workers that “we have to steel ourselves for more bad headlines in the coming days, I’m afraid,” in a Saturday note obtained by Axios.
The new scoops were expected to come on Monday from a series of news broadcasts that received material from Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen, but an embargo on the information collapsed on Friday and more devastating reporting on the company’s internal work could be released at any time.
The story that broke the embargo on Friday involved a new whistleblower who told the Securities and Exchange Commission that Facebook routinely dismissed concerns about hate speech and spreading misinformation for fear it would hinder the company’s growth.
The Whistleblower, who testified under oath and whose name has not been released, told the SEC in 2017 that Facebook execs discouraged attempts to combat misinformation and hate speech under the Trump administration because it would hold back the company’s growth – and because they were scared for the consequences of the President and his allies.
The whistleblower, like Haugen, a member of the social network’s “integrity team,” said Tucker Bounds, a Facebook communications officer, dismissed hate speech as a “blink of the forehead” and said even though “some lawmakers get angry,” the company said, “printing money in the basement. “
A person who was working on Facebook at the time told The Post that the comments from Bounds sound accurate.
“That’s how Tucker speaks,” the former employee said. “The Tucker quote, as much as I disagree with it, really reflects the position during 2017.”
Clegg in his memo urged employees to remain positive in the midst of news developments.
“But above all else, we should keep our heads high and do the work we came here to do,” he said in the memo, adding that Facebook was making significant investments in encouraging the vote and raising vaccination rates.
“The truth is, we have invested $ 13 billion and have over 40,000 people to do a job: Protect people on Facebook,” he said, according to the Axios report.
The flood of exposures that blew the lid off of Facebook’s inner work began with a series of reports called “Facebook files” in the Wall Street Journal based on data Haugen provided in early September.
On October 3, Haugen revealed his identity in an interview on CBS News ” 60 Minutes ”.
“What I saw on Facebook over and over again was that there were conflicts of interest between what was good for the public and what was good for Facebook,” Haugen said in the news program.
“Facebook, over and over again, chose to optimize for its own interests, like making more money,” said Haugen, 37.
She left the technology giant in May after her device, which sought to address misinformation on the platform, was dismantled, and she copied thousands of pages of internal documents to have as evidence to back up her claims.
Several days after the “60 Minutes” interview, Haugen told a Senate panel Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, has not been held accountable for his actions and that lawmakers should make sure he does.
“There are no similarly powerful companies that are equally unilaterally controlled [as Facebook]”She told the senators. “Puck stops with Mark. There is no one currently holding Mark accountable other than himself. ”
“As long as Facebook operates in the dark, it is not accountable to anyone and it will continue to make choices that run counter to the common good,” she said.
Other material that Haugen has linked to media showed that Facebook downplayed or ignored Instagram’s corrosive effects on teens’ mental health despite being aware of the harm through internal research.
Haugen also said that Facebook exempted popular users from some content moderation rules and failed to crack down on drug cartels and human traffickers.
“The documents I have provided to Congress prove that Facebook has repeatedly misled the public,” Haugen said in testimony to the Senate Commerce Committee on Consumer Protection. “I came forward with great personal risk because I think we still have time to act.”