Humans need to monitor AI, claim Henry Kissinger, Eric Schmidt and Daniel Huttenlocher

Humans need to monitor AI to ensure that it conforms to our moral values ​​and does not displace us, argues Henry Kissinger, former Google chief Eric Schmidt and MIT dean of computing

  • Kissinger, Schmidt and Daniel Huttenlocher wrote and wrote on Monday
  • They called for a government commission to regulate the development of artificial intelligence
  • Warned that AI ‘avoids the primacy of human reason’
  • Argued that the ‘philosophical’ consequences of artificial intelligence should be considered










Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and former Google chief Eric Schmidt have teamed up with an MIT professor to call on a government commission to regulate the development of artificial intelligence.

Kissinger, Schmidt and Daniel Huttenlocher, dean of the Schwarzman College of Computing at MIT, shared their arguments in an op-ed, published Monday in the Wall Street Journal.

In it, they warned that AI has the potential to raise profound existential and philosophical questions about the ‘primacy of human reason’ and the role of humans in the world.

The trio called for the establishment of a commission tasked with ‘shaping AI with human values, including human dignity and moral freedom of action.’

“In the United States, a commission should be set up, administered by the government but staffed by many thinkers in many areas. The development of artificial intelligence is inevitable, but its ultimate destination is not, ‘they wrote.

The three men argued that the development of artificial intelligence raises important questions about the nature of creativity and the role of humans in the world.

‘If an AI writes the best screenplay of the year, should it win an Oscar? If an artificial intelligence simulates or completes this year’s most consistent diplomatic debate, should it then win the Nobel Peace Prize? Should the human inventors? ‘ they wrote.

“Throughout history, people have sought to understand reality and our role in it,” the essay states.

‘Now AI, a product of human ingenuity, removes the primacy of human reason: it examines and comes to perceive aspects of the world faster than we do, different from the way we do, and in some cases in ways we do not understand’ , it continued.

The three men argued that the development of artificial intelligence raises important questions about the nature of creativity and the role of humans in the world.

The three men argued that the development of artificial intelligence raises important questions about the nature of creativity and the role of humans in the world.

Last month, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy called for the creation of a ‘declaration of rights’ to protect against the abuse of artificial intelligence.

“Our country should clarify the rights and freedoms we expect data-driven technologies to respect,” wrote OSTP Director Dr. Eric Lander and OSTP Deputy Director of Science and Society Alondra Nelson i and op-ed.

“In a competitive marketplace, it can seem easier to cut corners,” they added.

“But it is unacceptable to create AI systems that will harm many people, just as it is unacceptable to create drugs and other products – whether it be cars, children’s toys or medical devices – that will harm many people.”

In recent years, the Federal Trade Commission has also sought to regulate certain uses of artificial intelligence in lending decisions.

Many have also expressed concern about the potential for racial bias in AI systems.

On Wednesday, Black Lives Matter co-founder Opal Tometi urged the tech sector to act quickly against persistent racism in systems like face recognition.

“Many of the algorithms, many of the data are racist,” the American activist who co-founded BLM told Reuters on the sidelines of the Lisbon web summit.

“We need technology to really understand every way it (racism) manifests itself in the technologies they develop,” she said.

.

Leave a Comment