The Biden administration defends its decision not to assert executive privileges over Trump’s White House records

The House committee claims it desperately needs the papers for its comprehensive investigation into the deadly uprising and that Trump has not shown how he would be hurt enough to prevent the records from being released. And the Biden administration is defending its decision that records from the White House from January 6 should not be protected by executive privileges. Trump has disagreed, and his insistence on secrecy led him to sue in October.

The case, which is a major case of the president’s authority and executive privileges as well as house searches, raises unresolved questions about a former president’s power to verify information from his White House, even when the current administration and Congress support transparency in the registers.

“Allowing a former president to override decisions of a sitting president would be an extraordinary encroachment on the latter’s ability to fulfill his constitutional responsibilities,” Justice Department lawyers wrote in the archives Thursday. They represent the National Archives, which currently holds documents from the White House from the Trump era.

With congressional elections in November 2022 and the possibility that Democrats will lose control of the House, the select committee argued that time is of the essence.

“The selection committee’s authorization will expire on January 3, 2023, and each passing day hampers the selection committee’s investigation, forcing it to continue without benefiting from documents to which it is entitled,” lawyers for the House wrote. Thursday.

RELATED: Trump wants the Supreme Court to read the Washington Post interview with Bennie Thompson
Why the new legal attack by Trump allies against the House of Representatives on January 6 is a long shot

Their response comes a week after Trump asked the judges to look into the case and keep the records secret while the case is before the court. And both the House and the administration are now repeatedly suggesting the possibility that the House committee believes it has more to reveal about federal officials’ discussions to block Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s presidential victory – even possible abuse by top officials.

“Far from ‘fishing’ or looking at the former president and his advisers as a ‘case study,'” the DOJ writes, using Trump’s team words against him, “the committee investigates events involving [Trump] and other White House officials who have an identifiable factual basis and relate to a specific, unprecedented attack on the Capitol. This investigation undoubtedly serves legitimate legislative purposes. And unlike [Trump]s claims, these legislative purposes are sufficient to support the committee’s request, even if some members [of Congress] also believes that the investigation can ‘reveal crime or misdemeanor’. “
The Justice Department also claims that the White House’s recent negotiations with Parliament on withdrawing or postponing requests for some national security records show that the committee has narrowed down some of its requests. In the past, both the White House and the House have been criticized for Biden’s willingness to disclose records from the West Wing, and for the large amount of material that the committee pursues.

Trump “does not argue that even a single page of these records is beyond the reach of the committee’s legitimate inquiry,” the Justice Department also wrote. “President Biden has not deviated from protecting those interests” from the presidency, which protects communications around the president.

Hundreds of White House records sought

Contrary to Trump’s case, hundreds of documents are related to his response to the January 6 election, including activity logs, schedules, speeches from top advisers to the then president and three pages of handwritten notes from the then White House chief of staff. Mark Meadows.

If Parliament obtains the records, they could help investigators answer some of the most guarded facts about what happened inside the West Wing, as Trump’s team discussed throwing more states’ popular votes out of the 2020 election, and when supporters gathered and overpowered the United States Capitol on January 6th.

The House noted Thursday that it is seeking documents dating back to April 2020 because that was when Trump first began talking about the possibility of voter fraud corrupting the election. He continued with this accusation even after November last year, when several federal and state authorities determined that there was no widespread election fraud in 2020.

The January 6 committee was formed 6 months ago.  Here's what it's revealed.

“The selection committee needs information on various people involved in the communications during that period to determine when and how the seeds of the January 6 attack on our democracy were planted, which may help Congress consider remedial legislation,” he said. asserts Parliament in its opinion. application.

Other documents Parliament calls for from Trump’s White House closer to Jan. 6 relate to people linked to accused rebels or the “Stop the Steal” group, or who worked with Congress, security or visited the White House near The day the new cases say.

The National Archives has pointed out that White House records, even around January 6, are always destined to become public documents after a president leaves office, and some of what Trump is trying to protect has been routinely released publicly by other White Houses.
Trump resoundingly lost his arguments at both the court and appellate levels.

But while the archives had originally planned to give the House committee the records from November, Trump’s court battle put document productions on ice.

If the judges do not agree to look at the case in January, they may not discuss Trump’s cases until a month later, in mid-February, Parliament has said.

Although the Supreme Court has taken months to consider major power-separation issues in congressional summons challenges from Trump in the past, they quickly rejected an attempt by Texas, which Trump supported, to overturn its election loss a year ago.

.

Leave a Comment