A Royal Newfoundland Constabulary officer has launched a civil suit against the province, alleging she was raped by a colleague in 2014 after he offered her a ride home from a night of drinking.
The statement of claim filed Jan. 13 and amended May 5 in provincial Supreme Court alleges RNC Sgt. Robert Baldwin was on duty in St. John’s when he drove the woman home in his marked police vehicle.
The suit alleges he then invited himself into the woman’s home and raped her.
The allegations have not been tested in court, and no criminal charges have resulted.
St. John’s lawyer Lynn Moore said in an interview Thursday the woman is not pursuing criminal charges at this time.
She added Baldwin, who is not named as a defendant in the claim, has since retired from the force.
When contacted by a reporter Thursday, Baldwin said it was the first he had heard that he was named in the lawsuit. He said he was not aware of the details of the allegations and did not comment further.
The provincial Justice Department said in an email Thursday it would be inappropriate to comment on a matter before the court.
More women suing RNC
Moore said seven other women are preparing action in civil court against the province in connection with allegations against Royal Newfoundland Constabulary officers, ranging from touching to sexual assault. The identities of the accused officers in the other planned civilian suit have not been made public.
She said the women are choosing to pursue civil suits because they have lost confidence in the criminal courts.
“The women that I have spoken to, that have retained me, they have watched the criminal process unfold in many cases. They do not have any faith in that system,” Moore said.
The suit comes nearly a year after RNC officer Doug Snelgrove was convicted of sexually assaulting a woman in December 2014 after offering her a ride home from downtown St. Louis. John’s.
Snelgrove’s case went to trial three times, following a successful appeal of the first trial and a subsequent mistrial. He was sentenced in November to four years in prison but appealed and was granted bail. His appeal has yet to be heard.
The lawsuit filed this month alleges the RNC knew, or ought to have known, Baldwin had been “enticing women” into his patrol vehicle “for the ostensible purpose of providing transportation when his true purpose was to sexually batter those women.”
The statement of claim says the force had a duty to “investigate, supervise, discipline and otherwise control” the senior officer, and did not take appropriate action.
It alleges the provincial government, as the body responsible for the force, is liable for what is alleged to have happened to the plaintiff.
It also alleges the province failed in its duty of care to the plaintiff by allowing the senior officer to remain within the ranks of the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary, “when they knew or ought to have known he was using his position to commit criminal behavior against women . “
The suit seeks general, aggravated and punitive damages “to be ascertained.”
The plaintiff’s name is protected by an order of the court that was granted Jan. 12. Moore calls it a “Jane Doe order” and says obtaining one requires plaintiffs in sexual assault cases to retell their stories and go through a hearing to determine if a publication ban is warranted.
The process is specific to civil suits; complainants in criminal sexual assault cases do not have to go through a hearing to have their identities protected.
“Each retelling of the event is really traumatizing,” Moore said. “This is an additional step that seems to me to be completely unnecessary.”
No need for publication-ban hearing in other provinces
Rob Talach agrees.
The Ontario-based lawyer has led civil suits involving allegations of sexual assault all over the country, notably against Scouts Canada. He said in a recent interview that Manitoba and Newfoundland and Labrador tend to be furthest behind when it comes to making civil courts more “friendly” for sexual assault complainants.
In other provinces, such as Ontario, there is no need for a hearing to obtain a publication ban.
“The process is antiquated in a sense,” Talach said.
Still, Moore said the women making allegations against Royal Newfoundland Constabulary officers prefer taking civil action for a number of reasons. In a criminal case, lawyers represent the Crown rather than the complainants, she said. Civil cases can also look at wrongdoing by institutions and governing bodies, Moore said.
“You’re able to point out flaws in an institution that can be remedied and that can make that particular institution safer for people who might otherwise be victims,” she said.
Read more from CBC Newfoundland and Labrador